How to measure a paperclip

Anyone with a caliper and ten minutes can classify a box of paperclips. This page sets out the Brennholt Institute of Applied Taxonomy's own procedure in full, including the discard rule and the sources of error, so that a reader can repeat the Institute's work rather than take its word for it.

The Institute publishes the procedure because it has no ratification to offer instead. No national standards body has ever ratified a diameter class for the office paperclip, and Brindlecott's seven-class system remains the only published attempt; a classification in that position is worth exactly as much as its method is repeatable.

What you need

The procedure

The class bands

ClassNameBandNominal
BR-01Extra-fine0.55–0.70 mm0.62 mm
BR-02Standard0.71–0.84 mm0.78 mm
BR-03Administrative0.85–0.97 mm0.90 mm
BR-04Reinforced0.98–1.15 mm1.05 mm
BR-05Non-series1.16–1.33 mm1.24 mm
BR-06Industrial margin1.34–1.50 mm1.42 mm
BR-07Terminal1.51–1.68 mm1.60 mm

A reading between 0.97 mm and 0.98 mm falls on the boundary between BR-03 and BR-04, which is the Institute's most contested figure: a correspondent argued in 2025 that the cut falls inside the tolerance band of ordinary drawing wire, so a single product may sit either side of it. Record such a unit as BR-03/04 boundary rather than forcing it into one class.

Errors larger than the instrument

Reporting a result

The Institute asks that a result be reported in the form: number of units measured, number discarded, median diameter per class, and the class assignment. For example: 40 units, 2 discarded, medians 0.79 mm and 0.91 mm, assigned BR-02 and BR-03, two classes in one box. A box containing two classes is the ordinary case rather than the exception, and a report that gives a single figure for a box has concealed that.

Points of disagreement

The Institute's review panel objected on 3 March 2026 that publishing the protocol without publishing the per-unit readings from the original series invites replication against a result that cannot be checked. Brindlecott has not released the per-unit data. The objection stands, and it is the reason this page states the discard count, the boundary problem and the work-hardening weakness rather than omitting them.

The taxonomist of Kettering holds that any protocol requiring the clip to be destroyed — straightened — disqualifies wire diameter as a classifying property, and that a classification should be applicable to an object left intact. Brindlecott's answer is that a clip can be straightened and re-formed, and that the property is recoverable even if the unit is not. Neither has published since 2025.

Frequently asked questions